James pulls each shortlisted project's actual unit distribution chart and checks what your specific unit type costs, not the headline "from" price used to get you in the door.
WhatsApp James Directly →The flyer says "from $2,100 psf." That number describes exactly one unit type in the project, almost always the smallest and cheapest, and it is very likely not the layout you actually need. Compare that headline figure against a different project's headline figure and you're not comparing psf, you're comparing two different units that happen to share a marketing tactic.
What The Flyer Price Is Telling You
Developer marketing anchors on the lowest number that's technically true. A "from $X psf" headline is calculated off the smallest, most affordably-priced unit type in the development, usually a 1-bedroom or a compact 2-bedroom, because that's the number that gets a buyer to click through, book a showflat slot, or ask for a price list. It's not false. It's also not the price of most of the units in the building.
What The Flyer Price Doesn't Tell You
Move 2 — What The Market Isn't Telling You Check The Unit Distribution Chart, Not The Headline+ Read → − Collapse
Walking developer showflats, the pattern repeats often enough to be worth naming directly: the unit priced at the flyer's headline psf is usually a small allocation of the total unit count, sometimes a single stack or a handful of floors. The 2-bedroom or 3-bedroom types that most buyers actually need are priced on their own schedule, and that schedule is rarely printed on the same flyer as the headline number.
Every project has a unit distribution chart, or an equivalent mix table, showing how many units of each type exist and their price range by type. Most agents can produce it on request. Very few volunteer it before a buyer has already anchored on the headline psf and started comparing it to other projects' headline numbers, which is exactly backwards. You end up comparing marketing figures instead of the price of the unit you're actually going to buy.
The fix is mechanical: pull the distribution chart for every shortlisted project, filter to your required unit type, and compare psf only within that filtered set. It takes minutes and it changes which project actually looks cheapest.
What James Thinks You Should Do
Ask for the unit distribution chart by type before you compare psf across any two projects. If an agent can only give you the headline "from" figure and can't break it down by your specific unit type, you're comparing marketing copy, not prices. Filter first, compare second. The project that looked cheapest on the flyer isn't always the cheapest once you're looking at your actual unit type.
Send James your shortlist and required unit type. He'll pull each project's real distribution chart so you're comparing your unit type against your unit type, not headline against headline.
WhatsApp James Directly →Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the flyer's psf usually lower than what I'll actually pay?+−
What is a unit distribution chart?+−
Is this only a new launch issue, or does it apply to resale too?+−
How do I actually get a project's unit distribution chart?+−
Does this affect how I should compare rental yield across projects too?+−
Sources + Show all 4 →
2. Urban Redevelopment Authority, Master Plan and residential unit mix guidelines
3. Singapore Real Estate Exchange (SRX) / EdgeProp, unit-type transaction price data
4. Council for Estate Agencies, Estate Agents Act & Practice Guidelines for real estate salespersons, cea.gov.sg
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Property investments involve risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should seek independent advice from licensed professionals before making any property or financial decision. James Ong is a licensed real estate salesperson (CEA Reg No. R008385F) with PropNex Realty Pte Ltd and is not a licensed financial adviser.
James Ong | CEA Reg No. R008385F | PropNex Realty Pte Ltd
Member discussion