Got the AGM minutes and accounts?
Send them over. I'll tell you what the minutes and sinking fund say about the building you are about to buy into.
WhatsApp James →The unit tells you how the seller looked after it. The MCST records tell you what the building is about to cost you. Most buyers only look at the first.
Before you exercise the option, find out who is liable for any seepage, whether a dispute is already running, and what the last three years of AGM minutes and the sinking fund show. For new homes, report defects early in the 12-month defects period, in writing.
For the physical viewing checklist, read Part 1: the viewing checklist.
Move 2: What James Reads at a Viewing That Most Agents Don't
+ The Read From the Management Side, Not Just the Buyer's Checklist →− Collapse
The checklist above is what any prepared buyer can run. What follows is the read that comes from the management side of the equation. From managing strata developments after TOP, handling inter-floor seepage disputes under BMSMA, and sitting on the MCST council when defect rectification decisions were made. This is not generic buyer advice. It is what managing buildings for 10+ years teaches you to look for that does not appear on any staging checklist.
Water seepage: the liability analysis most buyers miss
Water seepage is the most commonly disputed defect in Singapore resale property. The legal framework for private strata properties is established under the Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act (BMSMA). And it is not intuitive.
| Type of seepage | Who is liable (private strata) | What to check at viewing |
|---|---|---|
| Inter-floor: from unit above | Upper floor owner under BMSMA | Ask seller if there is an active dispute with the unit above. Check ceiling in all wet areas. |
| External: through facade, roof, windows | MCST responsible through sinking fund | Check if development is within DLP (12 months from TOP). Request MCST maintenance records for recurring external seepage complaints. |
| Waterproofing failure: bathrooms, wet areas | Owner of the unit where failure occurred | Check how old the waterproofing seals are and what state they're in. Some developers give 10-year waterproofing warranties, so ask for the paperwork. |
The inherited dispute problem
If you purchase a unit with an active inter-floor seepage dispute. Where the seller has already been in correspondence with the upper floor owner and the MCST about unresolved seepage. You inherit that dispute at the point of transfer. The legal obligation does not reset at the sale. Ask the seller directly: "Is there any current or recently resolved seepage dispute involving this unit?" before any option is signed.
Buying into a building? Know its numbers.
I'll go through the MCST position, the unit and your exit in a free written Property Decision Review. No obligation.
Get my free review →What the MCST records tell you that the unit does not
The condition of the unit you are viewing tells you what the seller has maintained. The MCST records tell you what the building has been managing. And whether there are cost events in the pipeline that will affect every owner, including you. The two things to request before any OTP:
+ What Three Years of AGM Minutes Actually Reveal →− Collapse
AGM minutes for the last 3 years. Recurring maintenance motions that appear unresolved across multiple AGMs are deferred cost. They become special levies eventually. Managing agent turnover more than once in 5 years is a governance signal. A sinking fund motion that was voted down is a future problem that was postponed rather than solved.
+ Why the Sinking Fund Balance Matters Past Year 10 →− Collapse
Current sinking fund balance. For buildings 10+ years old, the sinking fund adequacy question is active. Facade waterproofing, lift replacement, M&E overhauls, and structural inspection cycles all carry significant cost. A building at year 15 with a sinking fund balance that has not been reviewed against projected major works is carrying a special levy in its future. This is not something most agents surface at a viewing. It is something James checks before recommending any resale condo to a buyer.
The DLP window for new developments
+ The 12-Month Defect Liability Period Window →− Collapse
If you are purchasing a new development unit or a unit sold within its first year post-TOP, the Defect Liability Period (12 months from Temporary Occupation Permit issuance) is a time-limited right to compel the developer to rectify defects at no cost. After the DLP closes, those costs transfer to the owner and, for common area defects, to the MCST sinking fund. At key collection: inspect systematically, document every defect with photographs, and submit formally in writing to the developer with a reference number. A WhatsApp message to the showflat team is not a formal DLP submission. The distinction matters when the developer contests liability for a defect reported verbally.
James's Note
The most expensive defects at a viewing are the ones the staging was designed to make you not notice.
+ What Happens When Buyers Skip Physical Due Diligence →− Collapse
In managing post-TOP developments and handling MCST defect rectification, I have seen what happens when buyers skip the physical due diligence. Or do it superficially. The pattern is consistent: the buyer notices the defect 6 to 18 months after moving in. By then, the DLP has closed or the seller dispute window has narrowed. The repair cost is real, the legal path is expensive, and the outcome is uncertain. The defect was visible at the viewing. The staging made it easy not to look. Walk the ceiling corners. Check the wet area seals. Look at the lift lobby on the way in. These are not optional steps. They are the viewing.
FAQ: Seepage, MCST Records and the DLP
Who is responsible for water seepage in a Singapore condo?+ Read →− Hide
What is the Defect Liability Period and when does it apply?+ Read →− Hide
How do I check if a condo has a well-managed MCST before buying?+ Read →− Hide
Can I walk away if I find an active seepage dispute?+ Read →− Hide
How much sinking fund is enough?+ Read →− Hide
Sources+ Show →− Hide
- Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act (BMSMA): inter-floor seepage liability, MCST obligations, sinking fund requirements, managing agent licensing
- Standard sale and purchase agreement for new private homes: 12-month Defects Liability Period and the developer's obligations during it
- URA REALIS: residential transaction data; caveat registry; price verification
- IRAS: Buyer's Stamp Duty (BSD) schedule; property tax rates on residential property
- Singapore Courts: cases on caveat emptor in residential property deals and seller disclosure duties
- Council for Estate Agencies (CEA): buyer due diligence guidance; option to purchase process and timeline
Disclaimer+
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Property investments involve risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should seek independent advice from licensed professionals before making any property or financial decision. James Ong is a licensed real estate salesperson (CEA Reg No. R008385F) with PropNex Realty Pte Ltd and is not a licensed financial adviser.
Member discussion