Part 4 of 7 — Thomson Reserve vs Dunearn House vs Lentor Gardens
None of these three should be bought primarily for yield — and one of them has already proven that in the most direct way possible: a real, transacted number that's thinner than most investors expect. If rental return is the priority, this layer will change your ranking of all three.
Gross Yield, Side by Side
| Metric | Thomson Reserve | Dunearn House | Lentor Gardens Residences |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross yield | Not yet published — pre-launch | Est. 3.0–3.5% (2026 projection) | 2.5–3.0% — actual, post-launch |
| Basis | N/A | D10/D11 corridor rental comps | Confirmed against corridor rental data post-launch |
| Read | Unknown until launch and TOP | Projection carries the usual pre-launch uncertainty | Thin — a caution for a pure investor, less relevant to an owner-occupier |
Sources: PropNex Research 2026, project reviews for Dunearn House and Lentor Gardens Residences. Thomson Reserve yield data will be added once its own Yield Reality layer publishes post-preview.
What the Market Isn't Telling YouThe angle the showflat won't raise+ Read →− Collapse
Every one of these three showflats will talk up "strong rental potential" because that's what gets a hesitant buyer to sign. Lentor Gardens Residences is the one project here that has already been tested against reality, and the reality is a thin 2.5–3.0% gross yield — genuinely unremarkable for an investor comparing against other asset classes. That's not a knock on the project; it's a data point that should shift who buys it. A single owner-occupier renting out a spare room isn't optimising for yield the way a pure investor is, and the thin number matters far less to them. Dunearn House's estimate is untested and, like Thomson Reserve, will only be provable after TOP and a real rental market forms around it — treat the 3.0–3.5% figure as a starting assumption, not a guarantee.
Which Fits Your Situation
What James Thinks You Should DoJames's position+ Read →− Collapse
If yield is the primary reason you're considering any of these three, reset that expectation now. None of them is a strong standalone rental play at current pricing. Lentor Gardens Residences has already proven this with a real number. Buy any of the three for the corridor thesis, the school belt, or the retirement capital-preservation case — not for the rental income line on a spreadsheet.
James's Note · CEA R008385F · PropNex Realty
A thin yield on a new launch isn't unusual in this market — most 2025–2026 OCR and RCR launches sit in the same 2.5–3.5% range. What matters is whether a buyer knows that going in, or discovers it after settling in with a mortgage sized around a rental income projection that never materialises.
Read James's Full Note →− Collapse
FAQ
Which of the three has the best rental yield?+−
Why doesn't Thomson Reserve have a yield figure yet?+−
Is Lentor Gardens Residences a good rental investment?+−
Should I buy any of these three for rental income?+−
How reliable is a pre-launch yield estimate?+−
Read the Full Comparison Series
The Complete Comparison · The Price Floor · The Floor Plan Trap · The Pricing Test · The Yield Reality · The Spine · The Exit · The Management Reality · ↑ Back to the full comparison
Building your numbers around a rental projection?
I'll stress-test the yield assumption against real corridor rental data before you commit, across whichever of these three you're weighing. No pitch, just the working.
WhatsApp James — 9111 1173Sources+ Show all →− Collapse
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Property investments involve risk. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should seek independent advice from licensed professionals before making any property or financial decision. James Ong is a licensed real estate salesperson (CEA Reg No. R008385F) with PropNex Realty Pte Ltd and is not a licensed financial adviser.
James Ong | CEA Reg No. R008385F | PropNex Realty Pte Ltd
WhatsApp: 9111-1173 | wa.me/6591111173
Member discussion